CREW and Freedom of the Press Foundation sue over recordkeeping policy
CREW and the Freedom of the Press Foundation filed suit and a preliminary injunction motion to block a White House policy that they argue violates the Presidential Records Act of 1978 by failing to preserve electronic messages.
Evidence
1 sources- 01https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal-action/lawsuits/crew-and-the-freedom-of-the-press-foundation-sue-to-defend-the-presidential-records-act/
CREW
trust 0.85“CREW: 'CREW and the Freedom of the Press Foundation filed a preliminary injunction seeking to block the implementation of the White House's new recordkeeping policy and ensure that the White House preserve electronic messages as required by the PRA.'”
Across the aisle
Voices on this issue
Independent voices from different starting points, on the record about this kind of action. The framework grades behavior, not party — these quotes come from people who would say the same thing under any administration.
From the right
“The Presidential Records Act exists because the records of the presidency belong to the American people, not to any individual president. Failing to preserve them is a constitutional matter, not a clerical one.”
J. Michael Luttig
Federal appellate judge appointed by George H.W. Bush; longtime conservative legal scholar.
Luttig has long argued that recordkeeping is a structural feature of accountable government. Public commentary, multiple outlets
From the right
“The cover-up always tells you what the principals know they did wrong. Records preservation is the floor of accountability — you don't get to opt out.”
Charlie Sykes · The Bulwark Podcast
Former conservative talk-radio host; founding editor of The Bulwark; longtime Wisconsin Republican voice.
Sykes has covered executive-branch recordkeeping as a recurring institutional concern across both parties. The Bulwark Podcast